Hardware
USB Flash Drives
4GB

Kingston Data Traveler Secure 4GB Flash Drive Review
November 6th, 2006
![]()
|
Review Verdict
|
Essential Specs & Stats
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Protecting the Flash The first thing you'll notice about the DataTraveler Secure 4GB is its relatively large size. This is by no means a small drive at 3.06" in length, and those who use confining computer cabinets may have a bit of a struggle as I did if it's plugging into the side of a computer and not the front. That being said, the large size is not overly concerning to me, as it quite literally feels as if Kingston packed it to the brim. That's because those precious flash modules are protected by thick plastic and stainless steel coated with titanium, along with plastic "bumpers" to reduce shock. As you might imagine, this adds some weight to the DataTraveler Secure 4GB, making it the heaviest flash drive I've tested, even more so than the Cruzer Titanium that I ran over with my old 92' Accord. Don't get me wrong, it's not burdensome to carry, it's just reassuringly heavier. To get a feel for its durability, I did the standard tests of kicking it around a parking lot and running it over it with my car (more on that test later). ![]() ![]() When plugging in the drive, you'll find its contents to be rather Spartan. There's no obtrusive U3 or trialware apps bundled to muck up your experience. Rather, there's two small executables - MyDatazone.exe and MyTraveler.exe. MyDataZone is what you'll be using most often, as it is the key to unlocking the encrypted partition. Upon launching it for the first time, you'll be asked to format the drive (so quickly back up the other application so you don't have to download it from Kingston's website like I did), select an encrypted partition size, and enter a password and optional password hint. Once formatted, you'll be able to mount the encrypted partition by logging in. ![]()
The second application, MyTraveler.exe is 90% useless to me. Upon launching it, I found out it's an installer, where the only options given are if you want to make a desktop shortcut, and cancel or finish. No description is given beforehand as to what this mysterious application does. Well, to my annoyance, it does very little, apart from automatically planting itself in the startup items, taking space in the system tray, and showing popups whenever I plug in the DataTraveler. These can all optionally be turned off, but for something that just installs without much description, it almost felt as if I reinstalled AOL Instant Messenger and all of its nuisances.
Once launched, a hideable panel appears on top of all windows giving you options to assign a nickname to your 4GB flash drive, open the drive, eject it, and login to the privacy zone (same as MyDataZone.exe) - all of which can be done in Windows anyhow. The only new features here are the ability to write-protect the entire 4GB drive, and synchronize the My Documents and My Favorites folders as well as any custom folder of your own choosing, although you can't use this feature easily with multiple folders. The reason for this is because it remembers the last location and before giving you the option to synchronize another folder, it will rescan the last set which takes a while depending on the size of the previous folder. Needless to say, this "feature" was quickly uninstalled.
Performance While typically encryption dramatically slows down drive performance, I was quite pleased to find that the hardware encryption did a good job of keeping up to the file transfers. When transferring 64MB files, the DataTraveler Secure was able to achieve read and write speeds of 23.5MBps and 12.8MBps respectively on the unencrypted partition, and practically identical results of 23.5MBps and 12.8MBps on the encrypted partition. When dealing with smaller 32KB files, the unencrypted partition achieved 12.5MBps / 4MBps, while the encrypted partition got 11.9MBps and 3.8MBps. SiSoftware Sandra Benchmark (Normal Partition)
Combined Index : 15129 operation(s)/min
SiSoftware Sandra Benchmark (256-bit AES Partition)
Endurance Factor : 6.4 512B Files Test : 22466 operation(s)/min 32kB Files Test : 14341 operation(s)/min 256kB Files Test : 3963 operation(s)/min 2MB Files Test : 548 operation(s)/min 64MB Files Test : 19 operation(s)/min Results Interpretation : Higher index values are better. Performance Test Status Run ID : TWIG on Saturday, November 04, 2006 at 9:41:44 PM Processor Affinity : No System Timer : 3.6MHz <[ /> 512B Files Test Read Performance : 48509 operation(s)/min (3234 kB/sec, 21x) Write Performance : 11571 operation(s)/min (771 kB/sec, 5x) Delete Performance : 16089 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 22466 operation(s)/min 32kB Files Test Read Performance : 24037 operation(s)/min (12820 kB/sec, 85x) Write Performance : 7776 operation(s)/min (4147 kB/sec, 27x) Delete Performance : 16161 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 14341 operation(s)/min 256kB Files Test Read Performance : 5131 operation(s)/min (21892 kB/sec, 145x) Write Performance : 2342 operation(s)/min (9993 kB/sec, 66x) Delete Performance : 13628 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 3963 operation(s)/min 2MB Files Test Read Performance : 701 operation(s)/min (23927 kB/sec, 159x) Write Performance : 316 operation(s)/min (10786 kB/sec, 71x) Delete Performance : 5062 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 548 operation(s)/min 64MB Files Test Read Performance : 22 operation(s)/min (24030 kB/sec, 160x) Write Performance : 12 operation(s)/min (13107 kB/sec, 87x) Delete Performance : 1794 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 19 operation(s)/min Endurance Test Status Operating System Disk Cache Used : No Use Overlapped I/O : No Test File Size : 32MB Block Size : 512 byte(s) File Fragments : 1 Endurance Benchmark Breakdown Repeated Sector ReWrite : 475 kB/s Sequential Sector Write : 195 kB/s Random Sector Write : 37 kB/s Drive Total Size : 3.8GB Free Space : 3.8GB, 100% Cluster Size : 4kB
Combined Index : 14409 operation(s)/min
This is wonderful, not only are the raw read and write speeds pretty darn good, but the fact that the hardware encrypted partition barely suffers a performance hit is just fantastic. To contrast with the software-encrypted Lexar JumpDrive Secure II, although compatible with Macs, it requires Administrator privileges to run and suffers a 37% performance drop when encrypting.
Crunch Time... (This is just for Fun)Endurance Factor : 8.1 512B Files Test : 21382 operation(s)/min 32kB Files Test : 13626 operation(s)/min 256kB Files Test : 3971 operation(s)/min 2MB Files Test : 466 operation(s)/min 64MB Files Test : 19 operation(s)/min Results Interpretation : Higher index values are better. Performance Test Status Run ID : TWIG on Saturday, November 04, 2006 at 9:39:43 PM Processor Affinity : No System Timer : 3.6MHz 512B Files Test Read Performance : 46881 operation(s)/min (3125 kB/sec, 20x) Write Performance : 10943 operation(s)/min (730 kB/sec, 4x) Delete Performance : 15255 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 21382 operation(s)/min 32kB Files Test Read Performance : 22832 operation(s)/min (12177 kB/sec, 81x) Write Performance : 7312 operation(s)/min (3900 kB/sec, 26x) Delete Performance : 16443 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 13626 operation(s)/min 256kB Files Test Read Performance : 5179 operation(s)/min (22097 kB/sec, 147x) Write Performance : 2348 operation(s)/min (10018 kB/sec, 66x) Delete Performance : 12214 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 3971 operation(s)/min 2MB Files Test Read Performance : 706 operation(s)/min (24098 kB/sec, 160x) Write Performance : 233 operation(s)/min (7953 kB/sec, 53x) Delete Performance : 10939 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 466 operation(s)/min 64MB Files Test Read Performance : 22 operation(s)/min (24030 kB/sec, 160x) Write Performance : 12 operation(s)/min (13107 kB/sec, 87x) Delete Performance : 485 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 19 operation(s)/min Endurance Test Status Operating System Disk Cache Used : No Use Overlapped I/O : No Test File Size : 32MB Block Size : 512 byte(s) File Fragments : 1 Endurance Benchmark Breakdown Repeated Sector ReWrite : 546 kB/s Sequential Sector Write : 272 kB/s Random Sector Write : 35 kB/s Drive Total Size : 3.7GB Free Space : 3.7GB, 100% Cluster Size : 4kB I figured it'd be interesting to see how well the "titanium coated stainless steel casings" held up in an extreme environment, namely, withstanding the crushing force of my new Honda Element with a curb weight of over 3500 pounds. Now remember, this is waaay beyond life's usual mishaps and is NOT something that Kingston advertises as possible (though they do quote a review claiming it?s built like a tank), but I figured it'd be entertaining. As you can see, the DataTraveler Secure is nowhere near as forgiving as the Cruzer Titanium, crunching with the first run (granted I ran over the Cruzer with an older Accord.) The reason for this is the steel housing is only about a millimeter thick, acting as body armor to the vulnerable plastic innards. After I straightened out the bent USB connector and plugged it back into my computer, I was able to see evidence of the DiskOnKey being detected, although it could not mount the filesystem.
Recap Overall I'm quite impressed with Kingston's Data Traveler Secure 4GB flash drive. It's highly durable outside of being crushed by an SUV, doesn't require drying for hours after an accidental couple of minutes in the pool, it's speedy, self-destructs, and doesn't suffer any performance hits when encrypting files. The only two quarrels I have are the annoying and almost useless MyTraveler synchronization program and the lack of Mac and Linux access to the encrypted partition, although the majority of the DataTraveler Secure's market is Windows users anyhow. Highly recommended. Where to Buy?
Reviewed by R. Scott Clark, Consumer Technology Editor |
||











Via Feed
Via Newsletter



The second application, MyTraveler.exe is 90% useless to me. Upon launching it, I found out it's an installer, where the only options given are if you want to make a desktop shortcut, and cancel or finish. No description is given beforehand as to what this mysterious application does. Well, to my annoyance, it does very little, apart from automatically planting itself in the startup items, taking space in the system tray, and showing popups whenever I plug in the DataTraveler. These can all optionally be turned off, but for something that just installs without much description, it almost felt as if I reinstalled AOL Instant Messenger and all of its nuisances.
Once launched, a hideable panel appears on top of all windows giving you options to assign a nickname to your 4GB flash drive, open the drive, eject it, and login to the privacy zone (same as MyDataZone.exe) - all of which can be done in Windows anyhow. The only new features here are the ability to write-protect the entire 4GB drive, and synchronize the My Documents and My Favorites folders as well as any custom folder of your own choosing, although you can't use this feature easily with multiple folders. The reason for this is because it remembers the last location and before giving you the option to synchronize another folder, it will rescan the last set which takes a while depending on the size of the previous folder. Needless to say, this "feature" was quickly uninstalled.
Performance
As you can see, the DataTraveler Secure is nowhere near as forgiving as the