![]()
|
Review Verdict
|
Essential Specs & Stats
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Executive Toy Design The Contour marks a large design shift away from SanDisk and other manufacturers' flash drives as a whole, practically presenting itself as an MP3 player thanks to the glossy plastic front mixed with a hard metal backing similar to an iPod or SanDisk's e200 player. Unlike a MP3 player though, the Contour dares not to leave its connector vulnerable, featuring a retractable USB plug similar to the Cruzer Titanium and Cruzer Micro. The sliding mechanism is a bit different this time around, as the entire drive acts as the switch as illustrated by SanDisk below. You must slide the plastic portion of the drive backwards to reveal the USB connector, and then slide it forward to be locked in place and flush with the metal backing. To hide the connector, push forward on the plastic so that it covers the USB connector, then slide the plastic backwards so it's once again flush. A small door will cover the connector so dust can't get in. ![]() ![]() While the design seems simple enough, there are several flaws to it. For one, it takes some effort to actually move the connector, and the placement of the traction ridges towards the front of the drive aren't ideal, making it very hard to open and close the drive with one hand.
Second, the amount of force required to move the drive sometimes works against you, pushing the drive farther than you intended and partially opening/closing the drive instead. When this happens while opening the drive, the metal door will actually remain ajar, slightly adding to the overall height of the USB plug. With the door exposed, the flash drive will still plug into your computer's ports, but it can be a snug fit.
Other issues also exist with the Cruzer Contour's design as well. The base of the drive is just wide enough to block adjacent USB ports, so you'll need to purchase a USB hub or extension cable when ports are limited. To maintain the smooth lines of the Contour, the lanyard hole - a staple feature found on every conventional flash drive manufactured until now - is missing. Instead, a leather pouch is supplied that features its own clip for a keychain, but this is also rather large and inconvenient. At least the leather removes the sound of clanging against keys that was present with the Cruzer Titanium.
![]() ![]() The Cruzer Contour comes pre-loaded with the U3 portable application platform, what started as a joint venture between SanDisk and (their now-subsidiary) M-Systems. In a nutshell, U3 allows you to take portable applications with you between computers, without ever needing to install software on any of the machines being used, without the need for administrator access. The way U3 does this is by acting as a virtual CD-ROM drive, thus taking advantage of Windows Autorun and automatically starting the Launchpad software - a system tray application that provides shortcuts to your files, portable applications, and a quick means to eject the drive.
A large variety of U3 compatible programs can be downloaded from U3 Download Center, many of which are free or have trial versions available. These programs range from antivirus solutions to instant messengers, games, photo editors, synchronization managers, secure web browsers and office replacements such as OpenOffice.org and ThinkFree Office. To see the full list, check out http://software.U3.com/.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() SanDisk officially rates the Cruzer Contour 4GB flash drive with read and write speeds of 25MB/s and 18MB/s respectively, a healthy boost from its Cruzer Titanium predecessor that I previously benchmarked at 16MB/s and 11.7MB/s using SiSoftware Sandra. Now taking the Contour through Sandra, I was able to hit speeds of 28.8MB/s and 17.1MB/s during the 64MB file test, a bit faster than the official read speeds, but about 1MB shy of the posted write speed. Smaller 512B file transfer speeds had huge performance gains, reaching read and write speeds of 16.9MB/s and 2.1MB/s whereas the older Cruzer Titanium couldn't even hit 1MB/s. SiSoftware Sandra Benchmark
Combined Index : 7938 operation(s)/min
HDTach RW also showed promising results, averaging 26.4MB/s for the read test and 16MB/s for the write test, with a 30.9MB/s burst speed. Random access latency was a healthy 0.5ms.
Endurance Factor : 35.1 512B Files Test : 9272 operation(s)/min 32kB Files Test : 9668 operation(s)/min 256kB Files Test : 4123 operation(s)/min 2MB Files Test : 684 operation(s)/min 64MB Files Test : 25 operation(s)/min Results Interpretation : Higher index values are better. Performance Test Status Run ID : ALEX on Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 7:05:52 PM Processor Affinity : No System Timer : 3.6MHz 512B Files Test Read Performance : 32512 operation(s)/min (17340 kB/sec, 115x) Write Performance : 4054 operation(s)/min (2162 kB/sec, 14x) Delete Performance : 6499 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 9272 operation(s)/min 32kB Files Test Read Performance : 30592 operation(s)/min (16316 kB/sec, 108x) Write Performance : 4344 operation(s)/min (2317 kB/sec, 15x) Delete Performance : 6775 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 9668 operation(s)/min 256kB Files Test Read Performance : 6463 operation(s)/min (27575 kB/sec, 183x) Write Performance : 2230 operation(s)/min (9515 kB/sec, 63x) Delete Performance : 6598 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 4123 operation(s)/min 2MB Files Test Read Performance : 857 operation(s)/min (29252 kB/sec, 195x) Write Performance : 406 operation(s)/min (13858 kB/sec, 92x) Delete Performance : 4566 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 684 operation(s)/min 64MB Files Test Read Performance : 27 operation(s)/min (29491 kB/sec, 196x) Write Performance : 16 operation(s)/min (17476 kB/sec, 116x) Delete Performance : 2000 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 25 operation(s)/min Endurance Test Status Operating System Disk Cache Used : No Use Overlapped I/O : No Test File Size : 32MB Block Size : 512 byte(s) File Fragments : 1 Endurance Benchmark Breakdown Repeated Sector ReWrite : 612 kB/s Sequential Sector Write : 433 kB/s Random Sector Write : 10 kB/s Drive Total Size : 3.7GB Free Space : 3.8GB, 103% Cluster Size : 32kB
Overall the Cruzer Contour is a so-so upgrade from the Cruzer Titanium as SanDisk's new flagship drive. Read and write speeds have made significant improvements over previous models, but the bulky, fingerprint-laden appearance of the drive and the difficulty experienced when opening the drive in one hand seems like a design step in the wrong direction. The (removable) U3 platform is a nice addition for those who like carrying their applications with them between computers, although since it's being phased out as soon as next year, I can't necessarily recommend it for anything more than password protecting the drive or the bundled Dmailer / CruzerSync application. To sum up SanDisk's latest offering in 3 words: form over function. Where to Buy?
Reviewed by R. Scott Clark, Consumer Technology Editor |
||













Via Feed
Via Newsletter


While the design seems simple enough, there are several flaws to it. For one, it takes some effort to actually move the connector, and the placement of the traction ridges towards the front of the drive aren't ideal, making it very hard to open and close the drive with one hand.
Second, the amount of force required to move the drive sometimes works against you, pushing the drive farther than you intended and partially opening/closing the drive instead. When this happens while opening the drive, the metal door will actually remain ajar, slightly adding to the overall height of the USB plug. With the door exposed, the flash drive will still plug into your computer's ports, but it can be a snug fit.
Other issues also exist with the Cruzer Contour's design as well. The base of the drive is just wide enough to block adjacent USB ports, so you'll need to purchase a 

The Cruzer Contour comes pre-loaded with the 


