Hardware
USB Flash Drives
4GB

Corsair Flash Voyager GT Flash Drive Review
March 24th, 2007
| Store | Price | Availability |
| Newegg.com | $199.99 Lowest | In stock |
| Amazon.com | $199.99 Lowest | In stock |
| TigerDirect.com | $233.99 | In stock |
| Dell Home & Home Office | $242.99 | In stock |
| Circuit City | $233.99 | In stock |
| Amazon.com Marketplace | $205.97 | In stock |
![]() |
| Two years ago Corsair made a splash in the flash drive market with the launch of their Flash Voyager, a rubber coated drive that's meant to take a beating (and fun to give one to as well). While we've seen a few new capacities come out, Corsair hasn't made any dramatic improvements to the line until now with the release of the Flash Voyager GT. Built for extreme speeds and conditions, we put both of these to the test in our full review. Obligatory SUV crush test below. |
Review Verdict
The Good & Bad
|
Essential Specs & Stats
|
|
First Impressions
Where to Buy?![]() ![]() ![]() For a drive that's designed to outperform every other flash drive currently on the market in terms of raw speed, I find it curious that Corsair does not advertise speeds on their website, and only mentions "GT Series - Accelerated Read/Write Speed" on the packaging. Make no mistake though; the Flash Voyager GT is blazingly fast. Using Corsair's specs of 34MBps / 28MBps (raw throughput) for the 4GB flash drive as a reference, my tested speeds never quite hit the posted ratings, although they're still plenty fast to satisfy the impatient gamer and geek that I am. As you can see in the Sandra synthetic benchmark results below, I was able to hit 32MBps / 22.4MBps read and write speeds during the 64MB file transfer test. Transferring smaller 32KB files, speed drops to a lower 10.6MBps / 4.2MBps, which still outperforms many of the other flash drives that we've reviewed in the past. SiSoftware Sandra Benchmark
Combined Index : 7049 operation(s)/min Endurance Factor : 23.0 512B Files Test : 3633 operation(s)/min 32kB Files Test : 13281 operation(s)/min 256kB Files Test : 5549 operation(s)/min 2MB Files Test : 756 operation(s)/min 64MB Files Test : 29 operation(s)/min Results Interpretation : Higher index values are better. Performance Test Status Run ID : BLACKBOOK on Tuesday, March 20, 2007 at 3:35:21 PM Processor Affinity : No System Timer : 3.6MHz 512B Files Test Read Performance : 40032 operation(s)/min (2669 kB/sec, 17x) Write Performance : 1189 operation(s)/min (79 kB/sec, 0x) Delete Performance : 12478 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 3633 operation(s)/min 32kB Files Test Read Performance : 20392 operation(s)/min (10876 kB/sec, 72x) Write Performance : 8016 operation(s)/min (4275 kB/sec, 28x) Delete Performance : 11842 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 13281 operation(s)/min 256kB Files Test Read Performance : 6738 operation(s)/min (28749 kB/sec, 191x) Write Performance : 3663 operation(s)/min (15629 kB/sec, 104x) Delete Performance : 10794 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 5549 operation(s)/min 2MB Files Test Read Performance : 938 operation(s)/min (32017 kB/sec, 213x) Write Performance : 446 operation(s)/min (15223 kB/sec, 101x) Delete Performance : 8805 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 756 operation(s)/min 64MB Files Test Read Performance : 30 operation(s)/min (32768 kB/sec, 218x) Write Performance : 21 operation(s)/min (22938 kB/sec, 152x) Delete Performance : 568 operation(s)/min File Fragments : 1.0 Combined Index : 29 operation(s)/min Endurance Test Status Operating System Disk Cache Used : No Use Overlapped I/O : No Test File Size : 32MB Block Size : 512 byte(s) File Fragments : 1 Endurance Benchmark Breakdown Repeated Sector ReWrite : 531 kB/s Sequential Sector Write : 489 kB/s Random Sector Write : 15 kB/s Drive Total Size : 3.9GB Free Space : 3.9GB, 100% Cluster Size : 4kB Still not totally content with these numbers however, I took the Flash Voyager GT for a spin in HD Tach, which pumped out very similar results with 32.1MBps / 22.5MBps average read and write speeds. What's relieving here however is that HD Tach reported a 34MBps burst speed, giving the 34MBps claim some credibility. Okay, enough with the synthetic benchmarks. The people who actually go out and buy this drive won't be spending their time throwing insignificant word documents on it or inflating their ego by running benchmarks all day (okay, maybe they will); they'll be too busy transferring large disk images, movies, setup files and zip archives to care. For real world testing, I copied a defragmented 640MB ISO file to and from the Flash Voyager GT using Microsoft Robocopy, producing read and write speeds of 29.3MBps and 21.5MBps respectively. That's pretty darned impressive! Bundled Security Perhaps my favorite thing about the Flash Voyager apart from its speeds is the inclusion of the TrueCrypt encryption software. This ingenious software can create an encrypted volume to be mounted to a drive letter either through a file or an entire device, and can create a hidden volume in a regular volume's empty space for plausible deniability (when at gunpoint, give a password that works for everything except your uber-secret files, and they have no way of proving you're lying). For multiple layers of security, it's also possible to use keyfiles (ordinary jpegs, mp3s, etc) in combination with a password. There are several encryption and hashing algorithms to choose from as well, including the industry standard AES algorithm. ![]() We all know the Flash Voyager is more durable than your average flash drive just by looking at it. It's also fun to fiddle with the rubber casing when bored in a waiting room. What's important to remember however is that Corsair has no posted numbers dealing with submersion depth tolerances, crush resistance, falling height, etc., and only claims the Flash Voyager line to be "water resistant", "anti-shock", and built with a "durable rubber construction" rather generically. For an official stance, that's not quite enough to bring out the worst of my testing. Thankfully, the unofficial stance is much more optimistic with their marketing taking no hesitation mentioning on their website that the Flash Voyager has been "laundered, baked, frozen, boiled, dropped, and even run over by a SUV in many third party reviews". In an email dialogue with a Corsair PR representative, it was also mentioned that the Flash Voyager was used as a coffee stir and stomped on by a lot of excited LAN gamers. (Now that's brutal). Okay, Corsair, you forced me to do this. Before I begin, let me just say that all of the aforementioned durability tests as well as my own are performed with the cap on. If you lose the cap since there's nothing connecting it to the drive, Corsair's support forums detail how to get a replacement sent to you presumably free of charge. For my first test of durability, I'm going with Murphy's Law: laundry day. Left in a blue jeans pocket, the Flash Voyager GT had to endure a super load of laundry in cold water with the easy care / permanent press setting, and then spend 60 minutes in the drier with normal heat settings.
Incredibly, the drive still worked immediately after being taken out of the drier. Okay, so we know heat and sloshing water don't phase the drive, how about sudden impact? To test this I got on the roof of my garage and tossed the 4GB flash drive down to the driveway as hard as I could 5 times, although technically it fell 8 times because my friend somehow doesn't know how to throw like a man. While not as bouncy as a rubber ball, the Flash Voyager GT did get some decent airtime, actually bouncing over the hood of my Honda Element and into the lawn on one occasion.
![]() For my final test, I decided to test its crush resistance by running it over with my Element and its 3500-pound curb weight. Like the three drives (Cruzer Titanium, Data Traveler) I've run over in the past, the Flash Voyager GT was wedged under the tire on its side instead lying flat to ensure total brutality. (Even cheap drives will survive being run over if they're lying flat). My apologies for the wind noise present in the video. ![]() After all was said, done and destroyed, I was quite impressed with Corsair's Flash Voyager GT. The file transfer speed is unmatched and the endurance factor of the drive is well beyond that of your typical flash drive, although it didn't totally survive the SUV crush test. With the bundled USB cable and thick lanyard, the Flash Voyager GT makes one heck of a package deal that's well worth the money and deserving of my high recommendation.
Reviewed by R. Scott Clark, Consumer Technology Editor |
||













For my first test of durability, I'm going with Murphy's Law: laundry day. Left in a blue jeans pocket, the Flash Voyager GT had to endure a super load of laundry in cold water with the easy care / permanent press setting, and then spend 60 minutes in the drier with normal heat settings.
Incredibly, the drive still worked immediately after being taken out of the drier. Okay, so we know heat and sloshing water don't phase the drive, how about sudden impact? To test this I got on the roof of my garage and tossed the 4GB flash drive down to the driveway as hard as I could 5 times, although technically it fell 8 times because my friend somehow doesn't know how to throw like a man. While not as bouncy as a rubber ball, the Flash Voyager GT did get some decent airtime, actually bouncing over the hood of my Honda Element and into the lawn on one occasion.

